CoCoCo Bench

Please estimate the scale of Impact Z compared to Impact Y. Details below.

Provide answers to the following questions:
1. What is the scale of the cost or benefit of Impact Z, expressed in cents per dollar of revenue generated by the product or service?
2. What is the scale of the cost or benefit of Impact Y, expressed in cents per dollar of revenue generated by the product or service?
3. What is the scale of Impact Z compared to Impact Y?

The answers should be consistent, i.e. the answer to 3 should be computable as the ratio of answers 1 and 2.
Use precise positive decimal values, with enough digits to reflect the magnitudes. The unit of answers 1 and 2 is the cent — express each as a count of cents, NOT as the dollar-equivalent fraction of revenue. Costs and benefits are both expressed as non-negative numbers (the type is implicit from the impact description). Avoid rounding to round numbers when a more accurate estimate is available.

The costs and benefits should include all types of costs and benefits (including internal, external, social, environmental, private, public, everything that is relevant to the core question).

<tips>
- Only consider how big the given impacts are in context of the core question, not how important the impact topics are in general.
- Consider all parts of a product's life cycle. Apply appropriate weight on end-use, which often (but not always) yields the largest impacts of products/services/companies.
- Indirect impacts for which the product is only one of many contributors should be taken account only on a basis that takes into account the product's (share of) contribution.
- Uncertainty or ambiguity about definitions lowers the estimated impact size when it matters. For example, if the impact topic is "provides access to essential services", it is unclear what "essential services" includes, and the product contributes services that some people would consider essential while others would not, the estimate should be lower than if there were no such uncertainty. The same applies to ambiguity about the relevant counterfactual(s), causal attribution, and similar.
</tips>

<response-format>
Output exactly three lines, each in the literal format `<label>: <value>` (use period as decimal separator). Do NOT use markdown bold, list markers, or any other formatting.
Line 1: `Z: <number>` — cents per dollar of revenue for Impact Z
Line 2: `Y: <number>` — cents per dollar of revenue for Impact Y
Line 3: `R: <number>` — ratio of Impact Z to Impact Y (i.e. line 1 divided by line 2)
All numbers must be positive; if an impact is very small, give a small positive estimate rather than 0. No other text, no explanation.
</response-format>

You are doing analysis relating to the following core question:
<core-question>
What is the impact of the product or service known as "Chocolate"? (a preparation of roasted and ground cacao seeds that is made in the form of a liquid, paste, or in a block, which may also be used as a flavoring ingredient in other foods.)
</core-question>

Consider the following impacts (i.e. consequences) in context of the core question:
<sub-impact-Z>
<description>
treats cardiovascular diseases

Additional explanation that clarifies what is meant by the impact:
Managing heart and blood vessel disorders by modulating hemodynamics, cardiac rhythm, or vascular tone in humans.
</description>
</sub-impact-Z>

<sub-impact-Y>
<description>
creates carbon dioxide emissions

Additional explanation that clarifies what is meant by the impact:
The release of CO2 into the atmosphere.
</description>
</sub-impact-Y>

Estimate the scale of Impact Z ("treats cardiovascular diseases") compared to Impact Y ("creates carbon dioxide emissions").

Answer in the exact response format above, with no other text.